http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Adoption News

08/04/07

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Father

Posted by : Coley S. in Adoption News Blog at 03:57 pm , 380 words, 210 views  
Categories: Breaking News
In Utah, the Supreme Court decided that unwed fathers filing a paternity petition can have an extension to the current twenty four hour deadline if the baby is born on a weekend or holiday.

Currently Utah law states that the father of a child must file a petition claiming paternity to the child within twenty four hours of the child’s birth. Nikolas Thurnwald was trying to do this but a holiday did not allow him to file with in the twenty four hour deadline.

When his girlfriend (who was only identified by the initials A.E.) became unexpectedly pregnant, she and Nikolas made plans to parent the baby and even began buying a few baby items. But her family began to pressure her to place the baby for adoption. She went into labor early and gave birth on Saturday, September 4, 2004. Nikolas did not learn of the birth until an hour after. He immediately went to the hospital but was told that A.E. did not want to see him.

The birth fell on a Saturday. He could not file the petition on Sunday and then the courts were closed on Monday for Labor Day so the petition was filed on Tuesday, the first business day after the birth of the child. By this point, the mother had already relinquished custody of the child to an adoption agency.

SPONSOR
http://www.adopthelp.com

At the hearing of the paternity petition, the courts ruled against Nikolas because he did not meet the twenty four hour deadline of filing the paternity petition.

Nikolas appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Utah arguing that the legal deadline should be extended if it falls on a holiday or weekend.
In a 4-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in his favor stating that the deadline should be extended to the next business day if it falls on a weekend or holiday.

But it’s not over yet…..
Now the adoption agency is arguing that the nearly three year old child should remain with his adoptive parents as they are the only home he has known. So needless to say, there will be more battles as this custody battle is fought out in the courts.

Sources:
Utah Justices Modify Paternity Deadline
Adoption Agency against Giving Baby Back to Biological Father

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
Unbelievable. When he filed to make his wishes known, why didn't they simply return the child???
PermalinkPermalink 08/04/07 @ 16:22
Comment from: Holly [Member] Email · http://africa-adoption.adoptionblogs.com
Actually, he had nine months to file. I live in Utah and Utah law allows birth fathers to file a form declaring their "interest" in the unborn child. He could have filed before the birth and then I don't think there would have been any question of where the child would have gone after birth . . .
PermalinkPermalink 08/04/07 @ 16:38
Comment from: AdoptionBlogs Editor [Member] Email · http://editor.adoptionblogs.com
Wow! Any word on why the girlfriend pulled the switcheroo and made a secret adoption plan without his knowledge?
PermalinkPermalink 08/04/07 @ 19:36
Comment from: John [Member] Email
Holly, there is a large difference between filling an 'intrest' form and filling a paternity petitiion. Paternity stops the adoption plan so the father can parent. The father didn't seem to know about the adoption plans, and had no reason to think that he needed to file, which could certainly be seen as a hostile act by the expectant mother. Also, how can you file a paternity petition until there is a living person over which you have paternity? John
PermalinkPermalink 08/04/07 @ 20:52
Comment from: Coley S. [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
Holly, I understand about that part of the law, but am confused as to why a father who is planning to parent a child would need to fill out a form declaring he has interest in parenting the child?? That falls back to Puative Father Registeries which I have never completely understood either.

Lisa, I googled after writing this post just because I was curious and something I read said that the mother's grandmother had been pushing adoption the entire pregnancy but the mother wouldn't hear of it so I guess (just a guess because I don't really know) that perhaps her family wore her down and convinced her that adoption would be the best thing.

Sue, I agree with you!

The main thing I don't get about the whole case is why has this little boys fate been hanging in the balance for two years?!?

John, thank you for your comment.
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 02:23
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Related Sites

    AdoptHelp
    Choose an Option









    Pregnant?
    click here
    AdoptHelp.com

    Misc

    Subscribe to Adoption News

     Enter your email address:
     

     

    Who's Online?

    • Guest Users: 103