http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Adoption News

01/02/08

Stocklaufers Still Wait For Son To Come Home

Posted by : Julie Crowley in Adoption News Blog at 09:22 pm , 336 words, 556 views  
Categories: Breaking News
Gary Stocklaufer, the man who made national headlines after claiming that he had been denied the ability to adopt his cousin's baby boy because he was overweight, and even went so far as to undergo gastric bypass surgery, losing close to two hundred pounds, in an attempt to regain custody of the little boy that he had been raising as his own, is once again back in the news.

While the courts denied that Stocklaufer was not granted the adoption due to his weight, but rather for his failure to follow proper legal procedures, stating that he and his wife took custody of the baby and brought him into the state, without first having a homestudy completed nor obtaining a court order, both of which are a standard part of Missouri adoption laws for out of state children being brought into the state to be adopted. Despite everything that has occurred the judge still granted custody of the baby boy back to the Stocklaufers, and ordered for that transfer in custody to take place this past Monday. Only Monday came, and Monday went, yet the little baby boy never left the home of the foster parents that he has been living with while this whole court case has been going on.

SPONSOR

Soctt and Tandy Kraus, whom have considered the child that was placed in their care their son, and not their foster child from the moment that he arrived in their home, are doing their best in fighting to keep him. They already lost one bid last week, for an order to stop the custody transfer from occurring this past Monday. They claim that the custody transfer did not take place on Monday due to the child's court appointed guardian being out of town.

The Stocklaufers had raised the little boy as their own child since he was one week old, until he was removed from their care at the age of four months old, once they were deemed to not be a suitable adoption placement.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
The Stocklaufer's made an error under the advice of the original attorney that they had quickly hired to help them bring Max home. They have since retained other representation. That is part of why the new judge reversed the original decision, he found the error to be on the faulty advice of the orginal attorney. Gary's weight was mentioned numerous times in court to the family before Max was removed. Obviously they felt it was enough of an issue that Mr. Stocklaufer had life threatening surgery to address it. The Kraus family knew before placement that this would be 'at risk' as in the baby could return to the Stocklaufer's on appeal. They met the Stocklaufer's before Max was placed with them. It is illegal in Missouri to hear a second petition for adoption on the same child before the first petetioners have left the appeal process. How can the Kraus family finalize an adoption on Jan. 17th when the Stocklaufers are still in appeal? The transfer on the 31st did not occur because the Krauses refused to return Max or acknowledge the second courts ruling (you can find Mrs. Kraus saying as much on a KMBC You-Tube video.) Technically the Krauses are in contempt of court.
PermalinkPermalink 01/02/08 @ 22:49
Comment from: Julie Crowley [Member] Email · http://stepparent.adoptionblogs.com/
I don't agree with the Kraus' actions at all. As you said, they knew this was a legal risk placement, they have no right to not return the child. The whole case is just sad.
PermalinkPermalink 01/03/08 @ 05:37
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Related Sites

    AdoptHelp
    Choose an Option









    Pregnant?
    click here
    AdoptHelp.com

    Misc

    Subscribe to Adoption News

     Enter your email address:
     

     

    Who's Online?

    • batman2008
    • Guest Users: 108