<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Queasy news for a Saturday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/queasy-news-for-a-saturday/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/queasy-news-for-a-saturday</link>
	<description>The latest domestic and international adoption news, announcements, reviews, profiles, adoption heroes, adoption advocacy and reform information as well as op/ed pieces.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromesthesia</title>
		<link>http://news.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/queasy-news-for-a-saturday/comment-page-1#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromesthesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adoption-new.www.adoptionblogs.com/2007/07/28/queasy-news-for-a-saturday#comment-238</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how they will explain it to her when she&#039;s older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how they will explain it to her when she&#8217;s older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Hanks Benoiton</title>
		<link>http://news.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/queasy-news-for-a-saturday/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Hanks Benoiton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adoption-new.www.adoptionblogs.com/2007/07/28/queasy-news-for-a-saturday#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Huh? That is SO confusing? I can barely get my head around it. Wonder how it sounds to a kid ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? That is SO confusing? I can barely get my head around it. Wonder how it sounds to a kid &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromesthesia</title>
		<link>http://news.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/queasy-news-for-a-saturday/comment-page-1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromesthesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adoption-new.www.adoptionblogs.com/2007/07/28/queasy-news-for-a-saturday#comment-236</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand that process completely. I saw a show about how a woman couldn&#039;t have children so she forced her husband to agree to a surrogant and to agree to using a donated embryo.&lt;br /&gt;
The problem was her husband didn&#039;t want anything to do with the little girl and she refused to adopt the child because she wanted child support from him, the surrogant mother wanted custody. &lt;br /&gt;
Then it turns out that the embryo was NOT donated and in fact came from 2 people who each had children related to the child in question.&lt;br /&gt;
So they bowed out while the woman who wanted the child had a court case and she won much to the dismay of her ex husband who was so adamant in not wanting anything to do with the child, it was depressing.&lt;br /&gt;
So that was quite a frustrating contraversy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand that process completely. I saw a show about how a woman couldn&#8217;t have children so she forced her husband to agree to a surrogant and to agree to using a donated embryo.<br />
The problem was her husband didn&#8217;t want anything to do with the little girl and she refused to adopt the child because she wanted child support from him, the surrogant mother wanted custody. <br />
Then it turns out that the embryo was NOT donated and in fact came from 2 people who each had children related to the child in question.<br />
So they bowed out while the woman who wanted the child had a court case and she won much to the dismay of her ex husband who was so adamant in not wanting anything to do with the child, it was depressing.<br />
So that was quite a frustrating contraversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
