http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Adoption News

08/01/07

A true anti-adoption nut, with whipped cream

Posted by : Sandra Hanks Benoiton in Adoption News Blog at 02:14 am , 850 words, 508 views  
Categories: Profiles
In a post from a while back, I questioned the existence of one Jessica DelBalzo, owner of a ridiculous website that sells anti-adoption mouse pads and things like an, "Adoption aborts the mother woman's tank top".

Hey! I'm a grown woman who knows that the world has more than a fair share of nuts and loonies, but I honestly did doubt that something as odd as a webpage called "Legalized Lies Online Store" selling "Save the Family Trees" mouse pads could possibly be anything other than a rather sick hoax.

Unfortunately, I was wrong. This young woman ... who by the way is not an adoptee, a birth parent or, to use the term she and many anti-adoption goons prefer over parents, an adopter ... has hefted the anti-adoption banner like a thirty-foot-long chunk of timber and has been lugging it around since some bizarre revelation in high school convinced her that she'd seen the one and only true light (What is it with unbalanced high school kids these days, anyway?), shouting, "Look at me!" and, "Buy my products!" ever since.

An oh-so-predictable turn of events now has her flogging a book ... surprise, surprise ... and, of course, it's apparently all about what she perceives as the evils of adoption.

Like others before her ... perhaps having taking a page from some anti-adoption-trash-sellers handbook ... she's putting out press releases in which she refers to herself in the third person and quotes "glowing reviews from authors, activists, and researchers."

Yeah. Right.

Any doubts that the person selling a book called "Death by Adoption" would call DelBalzo's "Unlearning Adoption: A Guide to Family Preservation and Protection" a "must read"?

Before anyone decides to run out to purchase this volume of bound silliness, may I first give a bit more info on DelBalzo?

First, a look at a bit of where her 'information' comes from, in her own words. We'll call the following "research", shall we?

Hello!

As of July 1st, 1998, I will be running an Anti-Adoption Mailing List. It is very important that anyone who joins understands that this list is NOT set up for the debate of whether or not adoption is wrong, it is set up for those who already realize that adoption is wrong and wish to have discussions without defending their viewpoint. Anyone who is against adoption or interested in finding out more about the negatives of adoption is more than welcome to join. However, any letters dealing with statements that "Adoption isn't wrong because. . ." will not go any further than my own mailbox. Anyone with any viewpoint is welcome to subscribe and read, but this mailing list will not be beneficial for any of the truly anti-adoption members if it becomes an argument -- we can argue on alt.adoption, in the AOL Adoption Forum, and most other places on the web, and that does nothing to facilitate taking action against adoption or exchanging thoughts and ideas (as well as anger, if those are your feelings) about adoption. I want this mailing list to be useful for those of us who are against adoption, to refine thinking, help anyone considering adoption to recognize the problems this system can cause, and to share our thoughts and support with each other.

Since this is a new mailing list, it will definitely take some time to gain members and support, however, I believe it can be a very positive experience for all of us.

Please let me know if you're interested in joining. I would like to have some basic information about anyone who joins, but if you'd rather not share, you're still more than welcome to join in! All I absolutely need is your e-mail address.

To join, blah, blah

Thank you!
List Owner
Jessica Anne DelBalzo

SPONSOR
 


Imagine the perspective she's gained in the last nine years from that!

But of course, there's no reason to take my word for the idea that this woman might be more than a bit demented and might possibly have some agenda that has more to do with money or attention or something else pretty darned kinky than a wacked out view of adoption.

Take a look for yourself at her Live Journal profile where she goes by Riot Mama Jessy, "that antiadoption grrl".

From there you can follow links she's given to her other work ... writing for a store that sells blinds, and a web site where she graphically touts adult sex toys with topics like, "How to Choose and Use Personal Lubricant" "Latex is for Lovers: Taking Fetish Fashion to the Extreme", and "Enter from the Rear: Anal Sex Tips for Beginners". (Believe me, there are LOTS more ... )

If this still sounds like someone whose opinions on adoption ... or anything else ... you'd respect, or even have any interest in hearing, go ahead and check out her latest ploy to add some cash to her bottom line.

I think I'll just chalk her up to another anti-adoption nut case, zealous and beyond redemption thanks to heavy investment in her nuttiness ... and related products ... and irrelevant to real dialog due to tight hugging of the ever-unraveling fringes.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Hawk [Member] Email
I have had run in's with Ms. DeBalzo over the internet for ages. She is surely one of a kind.

Her new book is a mirad of fallocies and incorrect and unsupported facts. I was recently given a copy by an overzealous Aunt that ordered it off Amazon just for me. It was like reading a child's book, filled with unsupport quotes and ofcourse quotes from other such "activists".

Ms. DeBalzo actively takes her children out to "protest" such events as the The Gala concert for adoption. It's amusing to me the amount of hatred she spews and masks as "family preservation". And what amazes me more is tha tpeople actually take up to what they are reading from her. They actually think she understands the plight of adopted children.

One of her big things is "all adoptive parents lie to their children" and by calling anyone else mum or da you are just "playing house". Jessy is a bit of mush all rolled into one and the more people who hear about her unsupported claims and see adoption for the positive light it truely can be, the better the cause against her will be.

Sorry for the long rant, Jessy holds a special spot in my heart because of her claims and I pray for her children nightly that they will see the errors of their mothers hatred toward forever families. No one needs her hatred spewed at them, least of all little children.
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 07:35
Comment from: Jackiejdajda [Member] Email
I corresponded with this girl.. in 1998..

She had such an incredibly closed mind at that time.. It was stunning..

I also saw that request for a closed minded email club.. It is so telling.

How in the heck can a person make any kind of informed opinion/decision (on anything) if they do not explore all sides of the information/subject? Especially from those that are involved. Or are knowledgeable on the subject being explored.

Explore by listening and asking and evaluating.. all the information needed..

I remember trying to explain to this ‘girl’ as to why I gave my son up..
Why I loved my son enough so that he could have a life.
A life I was not able to provide.. emotionally or physically..

Jess would not listen or respond..

My son did have a good life.. is having a good life.. He is where he is supposed to be.. Where IMO God Goddess.. Higher Power.. Allah.. wanted him to be..

I knew all this when I was pregnant with him..

But this ‘girl’ is trying to take my decision away from me.. or heck from others..

Bravo to you for brining the issue here.

I always read your blog..

Jackie



PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 07:38
Comment from: dawnf [Member] Email · http://www.openadoptionsupport.com
You know, I strongly (understatement) disagree with Jess's views but c'mon. There are lots of reasons not to take her arguments seriously and none of them include selling sex toys. I interviewed Jess for an article (ultimately killed because the editor felt like the anti-adoptionists were too "out there") and despite her liberal use of the word "adopter" she was a reasoned, articulate interview. If she feels that strongly that adoption is absolute, unequivocally, hatefully wrong then at least she has the courage to stick to her unpopular convictions. I'm not defending her views, which to me are too extreme to bear argument, but let's keep the criticism off her person and on her viewpoint.
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 07:42
Comment from: OwensMama [Member] Email
Sigh. It's too hard to compute this woman's point of view. When I adopted my son two years ago I never in my wildest dreams could've believed there were such opinions of adoption. I wish I didn't know it now. I'm literally nauseated from reading the words "Adoption aborts the mother." Funny, I don't FEEL aborted and furthermore, it sure feels like more than "playing house" when I'm worrying through my son's high fever, cleaning up his vomit or telling him for the billionth time not to pull the cat's fur. Now, on top of all this I have the added pressure of explaining to him when he's older how I chopped down his family tree with my evil axe and stole him away from his poor drug-addled "real" mother and his certain life of poverty and squalor he could've striven to survive and probably not succeeded.

All sarcasm aside, I admit there are giant, gaping flaws in some adoptions and many imperfections in the system in general, but I'm still unwilling to consider this woman's point of view. Guess I can't be on her mailing list now. What a shame.
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 08:31
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
Dawn:

I disagree. Sandra listed more than just the use and encouragement of "sex toys" in her overview of this woman. Both Sandra and other commenters here have rightly stated that, in order to understand adoption, you need to see it from all sides. Sandra is presenting Ms. DelBalzo from several sides, as well. All of the information pieces, small or large, fit together in the puzzle that is Ms. DelBalzo.

Jackie:

"Explore by listening and asking and evaluating.. all the information needed.."

Right on, my good friend :)

PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 10:03
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
soblessed,
Thanks. I'm thinking she may be a few puzzle pieces light, though ...
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 10:10
Comment from: soblessed [Member] Email
Couple sandwhiches short of a picnic, eh? Could be, could very well be......
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 14:09
Comment from: Deb Donatti [Member] Email · http://open.adoptionblogs.com
And Ms.DelBalzo is not profiting off adoption? Books, tank tops and mouse-pads indeed!
I guess not enough people are interested in the sex toys.
I don't think I would call her an "activist". Perhaps "entrepreneur" fits better?
PermalinkPermalink 08/01/07 @ 17:36
Comment from: davidk [Member] Email
I don't get it. It's not okay to sell a book and merchandise because the author's viewpoint disagrees with yours but it is okay to get paid to write this blog with advertising money from the adoption industry?
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 12:11
Comment from: want2bmom [Member] Email
Ok, so Jessica stops the evil adoption. Whats her plan then? What is her plan for all the abandoned children in the world? Whats her plan for all the babies born to crack heads? What should we do with true orphans whose parents are dead? Seems to me, its really easy to point out the problems with adoption, but where are your solutions, Jessica?
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 15:39
Comment from: davidk [Member] Email
want2bmom,
I think some of Jessica's solutions can be read here http://www.antiadoption.org/whyopposeadoption.html
I suspect she might go more in depth in her book. I haven't read it yet, have you or anyone else making comments here?
PermalinkPermalink 08/06/07 @ 22:12
Comment from: marythemom [Member] Email
Ok, I read her solutions in her article, and it still does not explain to me why I shouldn't adopt my 2 children. They are now 12 and 14. Their birth mother has 4 children each with different fathers, some of whom she married, all of whom abused her and often the children. She kept my 2 until they were each about 10 years old (she still has their 8 and 6 year old sisters). At age 10 she declared she "couldn't handle them anymore" and had the police come get them and put them in care. Now these repeatedly abandoned, unwanted and abused children are supposed to sit in the home of some legal guardian (assuming you could find someone willing to take them, preferably together- I'm assuming with no subsidies to pay for their many trips to the doctors, therapists, and medications, and is willing to put up with their aggressive, violent behaviors) until they turn 18? Never experiencing the unconditional love of a mother and father? Never breaking this vicious cycle? Yes, my children are mentally ill and are more likely to be criminals, but it is not because they were adopted, but because they lived with this "messed up" woman until she'd screwed them up so much they may never be able to recover, and then kicked them out of her life.

Maybe Jessica's views make sense for white, perfect infants (and I'm not saying they do), but what about all those other children out there? Believe me, I'm NOT saying the foster/adoption system is perfect, and I'm not saying this woman doesn't have a right to her opinion, but I am saying we all have a right to express ours too. Maybe if Jessica walked a mile in an "adopter" or adoptee's moccasins she'd find out that the world is not black and white,and to be totally anti-adoption when you obviously have not experienced it... well, lets just say I think she deserves to have a few metaphorical stones thrown at her.

Mary
biomom to 8 and 10 year old, adopting 12 and 14 yr. old.
"We may not have it all together, but together we have it all."
PermalinkPermalink 08/07/07 @ 21:02
Comment from: AdoptionBlogs Editor [Member] Email · http://editor.adoptionblogs.com
Well said, Mary!
PermalinkPermalink 08/08/07 @ 08:42
Comment from: davidk [Member] Email
Without necessarily agreeing with Jessica, I think you may be missing her point. The objection is that adoption legally makes someone other than the child's biological parents its parents by producing a "birth" certificate when the child was not really born to the adoptive parent. I think that's the crux of the "legalized lie."

A legal guardianship arrangement would not create another legal parent which I think Jessica and her followers feel diminishes the role, worth and very existence of the biological parents. The legal guardianship would serve the rights and needs of the child without creating a "fictitious" or "paper" family.

Personally, I see her points but don't necessarily agree with all of them. I think the adoption industry today is too based on the practices of the 50's, 60's and 70's which included the infamous model used by Georgia Tann. I think the industry needs to become child centered instead of money centered. It needs to focus on meeting the needs of true orphans rather than "finding" healthy babies for prospective adoptive families.

I think the extreme views at both end of the spectrum need to be heard, but that neither extreme has a clear view of the bigger picture. I think the scales are currently tipped in favor of the extreme pro-adoption view thanks to the advertising, lobbying, marketing and myth making of the $3 billion a year unregulated adoption industry.

David K
www.adoptionagencychecklist.com
PermalinkPermalink 08/08/07 @ 09:35
Comment from: Brad [Member] Email · http://bradadoption.blogspot.com/
David, the question is really "what makes one a parent?" Contrary to popular belief, biology produces a child, but does not make one act as a parent. Parenting a child makes one a parent.

Brad
PermalinkPermalink 08/31/07 @ 11:59
Comment from: want2bmom [Member] Email
Brad,

Well said.
PermalinkPermalink 08/31/07 @ 12:21
Comment from: lisachang [Member]
There are many children who will never get homes. Babies who are born HIV positive, children born with serious birth defects, children who are seriously ill.

Anti-adoption advocates oppose the adoption of these children; they believe these children better off remaining in orphanages.

They claim all biological mothers are saints whose children are ripped out of their arms. They ignore the fact that there are bio moms out there who gladly give up their babies. There are even bio moms who try to kill their babies after birth. Its not true that "all" bio moms are saints who want nothing more than to keep and raise their children.
PermalinkPermalink 06/09/08 @ 12:37
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Related Sites

    AdoptHelp
    Choose an Option









    Pregnant?
    click here
    AdoptHelp.com

    Misc

    Subscribe to Adoption News

     Enter your email address:
     

     

    Who's Online?

    • Guest Users: 88